Sulfur Manifesto

Top

Genesis 2:7 , we were made from the dust of the ground. Our research of the levels of sulfur in active organic soils is roughly 4%. In modern soils with no
crop rotation or rest and lots of chemicals the levels drop to 1% or less.

The main cause of death for man since we were made has been infections, not war. Bacterial infections and these infections are still the main cause of death in more primitive cultures who may have an organic food supply.

1860 the use of chemical fertilizers becomes a reality thanks to the work of a Polish chemist by the chemists from Farbin in Germany who made the first viable chemical fertilizers from coal tar.

Prior to this infections were still the major killer of man even though we had improved our ability to wage war.

Dementia was described but not on an epidemic scale, old age was the reference but lack of using gray matter could have been the real cause, usless-
ness produces slow brains, use it or loose it.

By 1906 Alzheimer describes "being lost in one's own mind" in reference to pre and post menopausal women ( 40 to 60 ) who had benefited from food
grown without any sulfur.

Dr Otto Warburg also benefited in our opinion with an increased number of cancer patients who also ate food fertilized with this sulfurless form of plant
food. He saw more cases than the majority of his medical colleagues in the rest of the world had encountered. But he described an anaerobic disease
mechanism. As we have stated the active mechanism for sulfur is the enabling of oxygen across the cell membrane.

Before WW2 got really popular most of Europe began using a form of chimerical fertilizer which had been developed in the West Nile Region of Africa by the same German chemical firm, Farbin now I. G. and the US oil men who had obtained
the patent to make fertilizers out of crude oil. This same region of Africa has been named as the area where Ebola, West Nile Virus and last but not least HIV were spawned. All viruses which benefit from the lack of intracellular oxygen.

But none of these diseases including cancer become a big issue in the US until we adopted or mandated the use of chemical fertilizers. That occurred in 1954 when a rider to the Farm Subsidies Act of the New Deal was added to the original
legislation, if chemical fertilizers are not utilized then the participating farmer will not be paid not to grow certain crops. Who benefited from this legislation? The oil companies who could profit many times over for the production of fertilizers
compared to the profit from a gallon of gasoline which was selling for less than 30
cents a gallon.

Now what has the US experienced regarding its epidemiology since 1954.
Is cancer an issue?
Is diabetes an issue?
Is obesity an issue?
Is heart disease an issue?
Is neurological disease an issue?
Are all diseases including Autism of greater issue than the increase in our population would suggest or justify?
All of our disease entities have increased some 4,000% since 1954 but no one gives sulfur a second thought because we have been told that "we get all the sulfur we need in the food we eat." Check any turn of the 20th century text on nutrition and that is what you will find printed for the benefit of the medical professional who were trained with these text books.

Linus Pauling was often quoted that our modern diseases can be linked to a mineral deficiency of some sort, he spoke about sulfur but most of us
remember his discussion about vitamin C. His famous "cures" were all about vitamin C. But who took our vitamin C away from us?

Did the petrochemical industry take our sulfur away? If they did they will not discuss it nor will they discuss the secret agreement they entered with the pharmaceutical industry not to add sulfur back into these "plant foods."

We can blame who ever we wish, but that blame will not allow our cells to regenerate unless we find a source for bio available sulfur that we can add
to our diets.

In 1985 Finland banned the use of these same chemical plants foods because of the high levels of cadmium they contained, and the Finn's believed that may be one of the causes of increased disease in their country which they were
able to tie the use of chemical fertilizes. Since 1985 Finland's disease rates have decreased some 90% compared to the 1985 levels.

So why sulfur? Why in the US, because we have become sulfur deficient?
Why in Europe? Why in India? Why in Brazil? Why would we want to do the same thing to the Sub Saharan region of Africa?
Why is Okinawa a healthier place than the rest of Japan?
Why is South Korea healthier than North Korea?
Why is infection still the major cause of death among the Amish and the other "non modern" cultures around the world.
Why have modern diseases come to the cities of India but not to the villages of India?

We need all of the elements we were made with but we the LIVE BLOOD and Cellular Matrix Study would argue that sulfur has been taken from us, or we have been deprived of it thanks to our farming practices and the over processing of the food we have available at the super market already prepackaged and supposedly fortified and enriched but lacking any sulfur what so ever.

If sulfur enables oxygen and oxygen is necessary for healthy cellular regen eration then its lack in our diets may explain why we as a nation are becoming
the sickest, fattest, dumbest, retired country in the world which has the highest number of aged and infirm care beds per capita of any nation in the
world.

Why sulfur is why the trade of MSM may not be conducive for creating a market for Bio Sulf or Organic Sulfur when the market that already exits is
incapable of producing cellular regeneration.

Return To Top