|
Patrick Mcgean Observations
Published July 20, 2007
Patrick Mcgean has been the Study Director for organic sulfur for many years. His observations are observations only, not medical conclusions. When and as you have the knowledge of what to look for you should be able to "SEE" what Patrick has reported and which is now published on these pages -- for Members of a Study group only.
________________________________
Karl
The "clap" is something I unfortunately think of when it come to "dose,"
when I was an undergraduate my fellow miners were always urinating
bright red orange thanks to the dose they were taking for the dose.
But as per the Study, healthy is 4 to 5 grams of sulfur twice a day.
Liver regeneration appears to occur when 15 grams or more is taken
twice a day, it also appears to take about 15 to 18 months to show
growth of healthy cells in the liver by biopsy.
Beth Ley suggests starting with 20 to 30 grams of MSM once a day.
Other researchers suggest a slow start say 3 grams and work up
which we have observed as causing a more intense form of detox
compared with jumping in with both feet.
AIDS, or the syndrome cause by HIV has been postulated at 50 grams
twice a day. Being that the HIV virus has been reported to destroy most
of the sulfur that may have been present and in doing so cuts down on
the sulfur based amino acids necessary for healthy cell growth. We
have too few Study members with AIDS to be able to add to that information.
But here is where we believe that sulfur can really be of benefit. 92%
of our Study members who took sulfur during their chemotherapy
regimens (something not unlike the viral attack of HIV in my opinion)
suffered no side effects to the chemo while reducing their cancer cell
counts and preserving their white and red blood cell counts.
If sulfur can prevent cancer cells from devouring the "host" we have not
seen it to date but those who had cancer who no longer have any
symptoms or lab work suggesting their disease mechanism may be
the quite proof we have not been able to monstrate. We make our
cancer, we don't become infected, and it is the classic example of
cellular regeneration gone "mad."
The important fact is that no one has ever died because of sulfur, what
you don't utilize you pass. Babu suggests a terrible healing crisis but
we have not seen such a crisis ever being terminal, nor have we found
any such reports in the iterature.
We, you and I still lack the information regarding Bio Sulf to truly understand Babu claim of its greater "potency" which is an interesting choice
of words, impotency means it does not work; potency means it works;
greater potency means it works better or greater. Is this a better verses
more better discussion?
Though it is a proprietary issue how do you make sulfur more better?
We recognize the ways to make it less effective, for instance pulverizing
and the addition of anti caking agents but how do you make it "better."
Sulfur does not do much very well, and that very well part in our opinion
can be linked to the increased transport of oxygen across cell membrane
which for what ever reason are no longer capable of doing so, and intra
cellular fermentation is the result. No energy produce but an open door
or closed if you wish to allow anaerobic metabolism to become the norm.
In our eyes that is disease, whether cancer or any other disorder especially
when viruses become extracellular "street" gangs bent on destroying those
cells which are lacking intracellular oxygen. We see viruses or viri as
garbage men who main function is to clean up weak or diseased cells
and in doing so gaining more DNA to reproduce even more viri to continue
the process, unfortunately not all cells lacking oxygen are yet to the
disease state but the virus only responds to the lack of oxygen.
Flu appears to respond well with sulfur, the increase in intracellular oxygen
inhibits the destruction they can render by attacking cells that are still
capable of healthy cellular regeneration.
And that brings me to the initial thesis of the Study, modern man is sulfur
deficient thanks to the use of fertilizers which contain no sulfur thus breaking
the natural sulfur cycle and the preservatives now so common in our prepared
foods. They are preparing us for the mortician so that he can use less
embalming fluids being that we are already "preserved." What preserves our
food also preserves us from cellular regeneration, the food chain works both
ways.
When one reviews all the claims for what sulfur does whether MSM or
organic sulfur all of the possible results are forms of cellular regeneration
even in the case of pain. Pain is the absence of intracellular oxygen, that
is how biologists explain pain. When cartilage regenerates it is cellular
regeneration. Blood pressure is determined by the vessels that the
blood must travel and when the vessels regenerate BP goes down or
normalizes. Scar reduction deserves consideration being that most of
the MSM we tested our sulfur against had never exhibited the ability to
make scars go away or reduce, the reduction of these scars is the ability
of the endothelial layer of the skin or other organs to finally enable the
transport of oxygen into the cells so that regeneration could finally occur.
Our body is in a continual state of regeneration unless cell damage or the
lack of intracellular oxygen prevents that cellular regeneration and allows
us to degenerate prematurely.
Patrick
|