Karl's Research Required Him To Learn Chemistry Including The Most Important Discovery In The History Of Chemistry
October 3, 2007
This is one in a new series of electronic newsletters written personally by Karl Loren.
The Philosophy of Chemistry
Physics has had many discoveries that claim to be "the most important," while Chemistry has relatively few other than just one such claim.
Do you know what that is?
If you ever studied chemistry in school, your book or your teacher certainly spent time on this vital subject. However, just as surely, you did not understand it well enough to pass even a simple quiz on the subject now.
The subject has been poorly taught for decades!
Karl Loren has applied the genius of his writing skills to presenting this vital subject, central to all of chemistry, in terms such that you will not only understand it, but enjoy your new understanding of it.
Click here to read this vital central concept in the philosophy of chemistry.
This brief excerpt is from one of the pages supporting Karl's epic work on "sulfur. You can CLICK HERE to read this
Here is an example of the illustration of this subject -- does this example trigger any memory of your highschool chemistry class?
Name Birth date Sally February 12 Howard August 22 John January 3 Jim September 4 Pete December 29 Bill May 4 Hint: What "repetitive pattern" do you see in the above?
The very basic chemistry discovery claimed that there was a "pattern" to substances -- whether put their knowingly by God, or somehow "naturally." This "pattern" was claimed to explain very much about different substances that had never been observed before.
In other words this was a "prediction machine."
With this discovery, Chemists claimed that they could predict the future. In many ways this proved true, yet most people draw a blank when even seeing the words used to describe this discovery.
Karl found that in order to understand the miraculous nature of sulfur, he had to reach a understanding of chemistry far beyond what he learned in school.
Click and read about this miracle of chemistry.
This very central discovery about "chemistry" actually has had more than 1,000 different claims made for being the ONE TRUE VERSION. So, there has been controversy about this over the years, among the world's most famous teachers and chemists.
For something so controversial, even in modern times, how could the most basic of concepts not have found consensus amongst experts? Would this controversy have cast a shadow of doubt over which version was presented by YOUR teacher or YOUR text book?